Apabila Ada Manusia Mendakwa Politiknya ialah Politik Rahmatul Lil ‘Aalamin

Baru aje buat post dah ada follow up issue. Ikuti Update di penghujung post

Masih belum habis lagi kita dengan Khalid Samad. Dalam posting blog beliau yang selanjutnya, beliau mendakwa

Persoalannya sekarang, adakah ianya “politik songsang” sepertimana yang Zam-kata; atau politik Rahmatul Lil ‘Aalamin sepertimana yang dikatakan oleh Allah di dalam Al-Quran yang bermaksud

http://www.khalidsamad.com/2014/07/sandiwara-politik-umno.html

Khalid Samad tidak segan silu memberi gambaran seolah-olah politik yang dibawanya adalah politik Rahmatul Lil ‘Aalamin padahal, ayat yang di petik beliau

“Dan tiadalah Kami mengutuskan engkau (wahai Muhammad), melainkan untuk menjadi rahmat bagi sekalian alam” (Al-’Anbyā’ 21:107).

jelas merupakan ayat yang ditujukan kepada Nabi Muhammad S.A.W. Apakah beliau mahu memberikan gambaran bahawa segala tindak-tanduk beliau adalah adalah tindak tanduk yang selaras dengan sifat Rahmatul Lil ‘Aalamin sebagaimana perutusan Nabi Muhammad S.A.W. oleh Allah S.W.T. kepada umat manusia?

Saya tidak mahu mengulas lanjut dalam hal ini, tapi cukuplah untuk saudara pembaca semua nilaikan sendiri, apakah kewajaran seorang manusia biasa menggunakan ayat yang ditujukan pada Nabi Muhammad S.A.W. untuk disandarkan pada tindak tanduk diri sendiri.

Kita letak hal di atas ke tepi untuk nilaian pembaca. YB Khalid mungkin merasa seolah-olah politik diri sendiri adalah Rahmatul Aalamin. Ini kerana puji-pujian oleh orang kafir terhadap tindak tanduk YB. Tapi hakikatnya ramai orang Islam sendiri menyampah dengan tindak tanduk YB. Kalau kita lihat dakwah Nabi Muhammad S.A.W., jelas beliau diperangi oleh orang Kafir. Memang ada orang kafir yang tidak memerangi beliau, tetapi peratusan yang memerangi beliau jelas lebih dari yang tidak.

Hakikat politik Khalid Samad berbeza sama sekali kerana dalam politik beliau, orang kafir melemparkan puji-pujian terhadap beliau, sedangkan ramai orang Islam menyampah dan mencaci beliau. Jadi bagaimana seseorang itu boleh tergamak untuk menggunakan istilah yang diberikan Allah S.W.T. kepada Nabi Muhammad S.A.W. sedangkan tidak tanduknya jelas berbeza. Disini aje pun kita boleh nampak ada benda yang tak kena.

Dalam dakwah Nabi S.A.W. pun, sekiranya baginda tunduk pada kehendak puak kafirun, nescaya beliau juga akan mendapat puji-pujian dari puak kafir. Sama juga dalam kes hari ini. Nak orang bukan Islam puji bukan susah, sama juga nak puak gay puji bukan susah. Sokong aje apa yang dia orang suka, mesti dia orang puji. Lepas tu mendabik dada kata akulah pembawa politik Rahmatul Aalamin.

Kepada Khalid Samad, cukup-cukuplah dalam berpolitik menggunakan agama. Jangan cepat mengambila ayat-ayat Quran atau kisah-kisah seerah untuk dijustifikasikan pada tindak tanduk diri sendiri padahal mungkin tindakan kita ini jelas bercanggah dengan ayat mahupun seerah yang kita cuba guna. Akhir sekali, apakah kelayakan kita sebagai manusia untuk secara sewenang-wenang untuk memberikan gambaran seolah-olah tindak tanduk kita ini dijustifikasikan oleh ayat-ayat Quran?

UPDATE

Baru aje habis posting, ternampak pula tweeter KS ini di blog http://darulehsantoday.blogspot.com/2014/07/khalid-samad-sedih-ajk-surau-dan-masjid.html

Bagaimanakah seseorang itu boleh mendabik dada mengatakan politik beliau seolah-olah politik Rahmatul Alalamin sedangkan 40 surau dan masjid beliau pergi, orang Islam dok caci dia.

Lebih malang, kita lihat tweet beliau sendiri. Golongan yang hati ditutup Allah? Wow. Apakah Khalid dapat wahyu dari Allah yang beliau ketahui hati siapakah yang ditutup Allah? Apakah kalau tak sokong tindakan beliau, hati sudah di tutup Allah?

Antara dosa yang paling besar ialah memperkatakan tentang Allah sesuatu yang kita tidak ketahui mengenainya. Mendakwa Allah menutup hati orang tertentu sedankan kita tidak ada ilmu mengenainya adalah termasuk dalam salah satu tindakan tersebut. Di sini saja kita lihat kecetekan ilmu Khalid Samad kerana orang yang cetek ilmu akan mendakwa sesuatu tentang Allah S.W.T. secara sewenang-wenangnya.

P.S. Teringat seorang blogger PAS bernama Tulang Besi yang perangai tak ubah dalam hal ini. Patutlah beliau tu penyokong tegar si Khalid Samad

RE: Kenyataan Akhbar Khalid Samad

YB Khalid Samad memberikan kenyataan akhbar yang boleh dirujuk pada blog beliau.

Akan tetapi, kenyataan akhbar beliau menimbulkan lebih banyak kemusykilan. Berikut adalah beberapa point yang perlu diberi perhatian.

Cadangan ini dikemukakan kerana yang selalu menimbulkan masalah adalah dari sudut perlaksanaan, samada berhemah atau sebaliknya.

Masalahnya ialah takrifan berhemah atau sebaliknya. Bagi khalid samad, ia berhemah apabila ia menurut acuan saudara dan tidak berhemah sekiranya tidak menepati selera saudara. Umpamanya dalam kes rampasan bible, bagi YB khalid ia tidak berhemah, tetapi bagi kebanyakan orang Islam, ia memang patut. Jadi apakah MAIS ini perlu menurut telunjuk YB Khalid dalam menentukan mana itu hemah dan mana itu tidak? Itulah sebabnya Sultan kata Khalid biadap.

Cadangan yang saya kemukakan bertujuan menyelamatkan Tuanku dari cemuhan

Bukankah Khalid sendiri tweet kata lebih takut kepada murka Allah daripada murka manusia. Jadi apakah YB Khalid mahu menasihati baginda Sultan supaya takutkan “murka” manusia dalam bentuk cemuhan (khususnya puak-puak kafir dari RBA) daripada murka Allah? BTW, apakah YB Khalid mempunyai lesen untuk menentukan Allah murka pada siapa? Barangkali orang yang YB anggap mendapat murka Allah itulah yang sebenarnya berada diatas jalan yang benar. Jadi tindakan YB Khalid jelas merendahkan martabat Sultan kerana YB menganggap seolah-olah hanya diri sendiri yang takut pada murka Allah sedangkan baginda Tuanku perlu takut pada cemuhan manusia.

Hakikatnya cemuhan manusia itu sudah pasti, apatah dari puak-puak RBA yang jelas amat anti Islam (dan Raja-raja). Kalau MAIS dan baginda tuanku perlu takut pada cemuhan golongan ini, nescaya mereka tidak akan dapat mempertahankan kesucian agama Islam. Akhirnya orang Islam akan tunduk pada kehendak puak-puak kafir ini dan segala betul dan salah bagi umat Islam adalah menurut apa yang tidak dicemuh puak-puak ini. Kalau mereka sokong LGBT, orang Islam pun kena sokong (macam YB pas seorang tu). Lepas tu dapat pujian puak-puak ini. Apakah ini versi yang YB mahu?

Harus YB ingat, bagi YB, mungkin tidakan MAIS itu tidak betul. Tapi itu adalah persepsi YB semata-mata dan orang lain pun ada persepsi sendiri. Oleh itu, bila YB mendesak kuasa MAIS dirombak semata-mata menurut persepsi YB yang mereka itu tak betul, itu yang dikatakan menghina Sultan. Ia seolah-olah memberi gambaran bahawa Sultan dan penasihat-penasihatnya tidak mampu memberi nasihat pada MAIS.

Akhir sekali, cadangan YB akan merosakkan peranan MAIS itu sendiri. MAIS sepatutnya bebas dari pengaruh kerajaan kerana kerajaan itu ditentukan oleh ahlinya yang mungkin terdiri dari orang yang bukan Islam, orang Islam liberal, dll. Kalau kerajaan itu sokong LGBT, apakah MAIS juga perlu turut? Bagaimana MAIS mahu mempertahankan kesucian Islam kalau ia terpaksa menurut kehendak dewan yang dipengerusikan oleh seorang evangelist Kristian.

Antara Mujahid dan LGBT

Mujahid sebagai pemuka utama orang Islam yang berlatar belakang agama dalam MKPN beria-ia mempertahankan golongan LGBT.

Kata Mujahid
“Ia (LGBT) duduk di bawah gender dan kita tidak boleh mendiskriminasikan seseorang itu atas asas jantina.

Dalam jantina itu kita sebut orientasi seksual antara lainnya.

Ini saya perlu jelaskan tidak ada kena mengena langsung dengan mengiktiraf LGBT tetapi ia hanya mengatakan bahawa seseorang tidak boleh didiskriminasikan atas kecenderungan seksual.

Saya sebagai orang Islam tidak mungkin saya mengatakan LGBT bagus, tetapi itu bukan bermakna saya menindas dia.

Itu dua benda yang berbeza, saya rasa dalam Islam pun benda itu diakur (tidak betul).

Saya tidak suka dia (pengamal LGBT) tetapi saya kena pertahankan hak dia. Ya kamu gay, saya tak suka akan perkara itu tetapi ia tidak betul jika kamu diberhentikan (kerja) kerana perkara itu,” katanya.- Mkini.

Banyak sangat kecelaruan dalam hujah beliau.

Kata beliau
“Ini saya perlu jelaskan tidak ada kena mengena langsung dengan mengiktiraf LGBT tetapi ia hanya mengatakan bahawa seseorang tidak boleh didiskriminasikan atas kecenderungan seksual.”

Persoalan pertama,
Katakan kecenderungan seseorang itu ialah homoseksual, lesbian, pedophile (seks dengan kanak-kanak), bestiality (kecenderungan seks dengan binatang), jadi adakah atas kefahaman Mujahid, kita tidak boleh mendiskriminasikan kecenderungan seksual sedemikian?

Mungkin nanti ada yang kata, oh cuma homoseksual dan lesbian aje, tapi tidak pada pedophile and bestiality. Masalahnya ialah atas dasar apa untuk menghalangnya sedangkan itu semua termasuk dalam kecenderungan seksual?

Persoalan kedua,
Dalam Quran, Allah S.W.T. menghukum kaum Lut disebabkan kecenderungan seksual mereka terhadap homoseksual. Jadi apakah Al-Quran salah dalam menghukum manusia atas kecenderungan seksual mereka?

Persoalan ketiga
Sekiranya diterima saranan Mujahid, jadi seorang cikgu boleh secara terbuka menyatakan kecenderungan seksualnya (homoseksual atapun pedophile) dan beliau tidak boleh dibuang kerja atas kecenderungan seksual beliau. Jadi anda semua bayangkan anak anak anda di duduk disekolah yang diajar oleh seorang cikgu yang secara terbuka mengaku sebagai pedophile.

Hakikatnya segala saranan LGBT ini tidak ada kena mengena dengan gender. Sekian lama kita biasa bekerja dengan golongan mak nyah. Disekolah, universiti, tempat kerja, malah ada yang menjadi pesonality tv. Tidak ada masalah. Tidak ada diskriminasi dari segi perundangan dan peluang, walaupun mungkin diskriminasi berlaku dalam aspek sosial. Jadi dakwaan Mujahid dalam diskriminasi gender adalah satu kepalsuan.

Yang sebenarnya tuntutan LGBT adalah sama seperti gerakan gerakan LGBT di barat yang mana mereka mahu menuntuk persamaan hak dari segi pengiktirafan status perkahwinan dan juga hak untuk secara terbuka menyatakan orentasi seksual mereka.

Amat malang hari ini kita lihat orang seperti Mujahid, seorang anak ulama dan ahli politik PAS menjadi pemuka bagi meneruskan agenda LGBT. Mujahid sepatutnya bermuhasabah diri dan jangan terlalu ingin sangat menagih pujian dari golognan sekular tidak bertuhan yang hanya ciplak segala yang dibuat oleh polopor ideologi human right dan LGBT dari barat.

Japan has Robbed our Victory

That is according to a politician calculation. We should ask Bersih to protest against the Badminton World Federation for allowing Japan to rob Malaysia their victory in 2014 Thomas Cup. Don’t believe me, see the chart below

Players (Malaysia vs Japan) Malaysia Japan
Lee Chong Wei vs Kenichi Tago 21 12
21 16
Tan Boon Heong and Hoon Thien How vs Kenichi Hayakawa and Hiroyuki Endo 21 12
17 21
19 21
Chong Wei Feng vs Kento Momota 15 21
17 21
Goh Shem and Tan Wee Kiong vs Keigo Sonoda and Takeshi Kamura 19 21
21 17
21 12
Daren Liew vs Takuma Ueda 12 21
21 18
17 21
Total Points Collected 242 234

Come on BWF, this is unfair. This is undemocratic. We won’t by the “popular point”. We collected more points than Japan. How come they still win the Thomas Cup. You have let Japan robbed our victory.

What Can We Learn from the Liberal about Hudud

I came across this article published by the Malaysian Insider. The title is An unethical proposal on hudud by Dr. Farouk Musa of IRF (Islamic Renaissance Front). This is what we can learn from the article.

  1. When Islam collides with the universal guiding principle (man made), we throw away Islam and adopt the universal guiding principle (man made).
  2. When the implementation of hudud (Islamic law) is against medical oath (man made), we throw away hudud and uphold the medical oath.
  3. Muslim doctors who carry out the duty on amputation for hudud have lost their integrity in upholding their medical ethics. In other word, as a medical doctor, your knowledge and expertise cannot be used to benefit Islam for the purpose of implementing Islamic law because doing so, you have lost your integrity.
  4. Medical ethics supersede Allah’s law.
  5. Geneva Convention and Declaration of Geneva is above Allah’s law. You can go against Allah’s law, but never should you go against the Geneva Convention and Declaration of Geneva.
  6. Your medical oath is more superior to your oath to Allah (la illah ha ilallah).
  7. When you use your medical profession for the benefit of Islam (in the case of implementing hudud), you have brought medical profession into disrepute.
  8. Medical profession is the noblest profession on earth. It is even more noble that Islam.
  9. Hudud law is simply heinous, callous and nefarious (check your dictionary for the meaning).
  10. it is morally wrong to consider giving your expertise for the implementation of Islamic law as a religious duty.
  11. Religious duties only involve observing prayer, fasting, giving alms and performing haj. That’s all.
  12. If you are worry of wrongfully convicting a person, you should just abolish the law.
  13. My personal conclusion from reading the article is that in the name of medical ethics, in the case where thief is convicted, it is better to let butcher chop of hand ala samurai than to have a proper medical professional to carry out the task.

 

What is in the Banning of Noah?

The recent banning of the movie Noah in Muslim countries has caused uproar among the many of the liberals among the Muslim. They are seeing this as an authoritarian effort to subjugate the mind of Muslim in response to the vast open flow of information from the west.

One of this responses can be found at Why Muslims should be able to see ‘Noah’ by Mustafa Akyol. He was one of the invited speaker by one of the NGO, renown for their propagation of liberal ideology.

Too bad, these people is only good at putting up big words to project the openness in their liberal thinking. Come to think critically, zilch. They are quick to jump into conclusion to assume that the authority is trying to keep Muslims at blind to the open world.

Now the question is that is is wrong to ban the movie and does banning equate to subjugating or closing the mind of Muslims to make them uninformed about the outside world as claimed by the writer?

Well, human have been banning all kind of things. Some countries ban products that use animal for testing. It is not because the product is not good. In fact the product may be better because it is tested on animal, which is the next closest living thing to human. But we ban it because we disagree with how they produce the product by exploiting helpless animals. We disagree with how the produce their product, so we do not allow them to make profit in our soil because we disagree with how they produce the product, not because their product is not good.

So come to Noah, why do we ban it? In the Internet age, do you think we can stop people from watching it? Obviously no. But we ban it because we disagree with how the producer exploiting a prophetic figure for commercial gain. What more when the prophetic figure is being portray in such an inaccurate manner in order to suit their commercial theme.

So we ban it not because we do not want people to know about it. But we ban it because we do not want someone to wrongly exploiting a prophetic figure for their commercial gain. By banning the movie, it will not show in our cinema. So they can’t rake profit from us because we disagree with people who sell lie to make money. Just as much as we do not use products that use animal as testing because we disagree on how the exploit animal for their commercial gain. Isn’t that simple?

 

Diminishing Anti-Hadith Spitting Venom at Muslim Majority

The renowned Malaysian anti-hadith, Syed Akhbar Ali is at work again. This time he is spitting out his utmost venomous hatred toward the sunni Muslim majority. If you read his article Universal Relevance Versus Jaguh Kampong Irrelevance not knowing who wrote it, you would probably thought that it was written by some Islam-phobic non-Muslim. This is no other than an act out of desperation from a desperate anti-hadith who sees his ideology is not going anywhere in main stream acceptance of ideologies.

Many of his points are not worth commenting because they are the result of his distorted ideology. I will focus on few venomous, yet idiotic accusation to the Muslim in general.

He says “If tomorrow an alien space ship were to appear and suck up all the Muslims and disappear into the sky, there would not be much of a negative impact on the lives of other human beings on earth.

Well, he should ask the question, if they alien suck him up, would the world feel a lost? While he points his finger to others, he forgot that the other 3 are pointing back at him. In other word, he is no better than the people he tries to accuse.

The point is that if his ideology is so superior, he should be solving worlds problem right now, or inventing Toyota, Peugeot or Volkswagen. But what we have seen is that he is the one who constantly despise Proton, the only effort by Muslim to make car while he himself can’t even make a bolt in a car.

He said Muslim don’t sing anything popular on the chart. Well, may be not to your taste because not all Muslim listen to western songs. But there are many beautiful pieces of music being produce in many other parts of the Muslim world (including Malaysia). In Bollywood alone, many of their famous musicians and choreographers are Muslim. So it is an utmost ignorance in generalization.

Muslim may not produce branded cloth, but they are know to produce the best cloth, leather wear and clothing items. Countries like Pakistan, Egypt and Bangladesh are famous for their cotton industry. To accuse Muslim not able to make underwear is an utmost lie. Either he is ignorant or his hatred blind him from seeing the reality. In some Muslim countries, clothing products are their main export. So you are saying that they can’t produce underwear while their leather jacket, cashmere wool product are highly sought after even in the western world? Egypt, despite all its problems is one self sustaining country. They produce almost everything for their own consumption from food, cloth to daily thing. But as a shopkeeper for a gold shop, his world is the internet (reading the internet while waiting for customer). He does not have real hands on to travel, live and see how others are living their life and yet he spit out venomous accusation from his arm chair.

His whole point is to call people upon his anti hadith ideology. Calling people to return to the Quran is fine. But the reality is that he is asking people to follow his band of interpretation of Quran and the whole load of his distorted ideology. We do not want to argue about his ideology here, but we shall ask the readers to judge him based on what he likes to accuse others.

Our premise is simple. If the majority of Muslims who follow the Ahlul Sunnah teaching is so backward, he has to show to the world, how forward are the people who follow his ideology. Give us some names of the Quraniun who has utmost contribution to the world in science, technology and business. At least he should show to the world that he is the living example of progress and success. But what we see is that he is nothing but a banker turned gold shopkeeper. Has he ever (or able) to make an underwear on his own? I bet he can’t even produce the jewellery on his own. He merely take it from the “kafir” goldsmith and sell it in his shop.

Let us look at his mahaguru, Kassim Ahmad who is known for similarity with his ideology. What has Kassim Ahmad contributed to the society? Has he ever produced an underwear? He is old and dying (almost like an alien going to suck him up), does the world missing him? All we see is that his entire life working as teacher, lecturer in insignificant fields like hikayat hang tuah and African studies.

I am sorry to bring Kassim Ahmad into picture. It is not my intention to diminish his life or work. Put aside his ideology, in actual fact, there is nothing wrong with what he is doing. Everybody has their own capacity and scope of work. But for an anti hadith like Syed Akhbar Ali to go around spitting venomous accusation to the Muslim majority while he and his ideology is no better than others (or worse), it is utmost disgusting. He has been appointed to “help” the government combating corruption, but really what is his contribution? Has corruption went down after the government received his “con-sultant” services? In this simple task, he has failed miserably.

In actual fact, all his accusations are inaccurate. There are many Muslims around the world who are much more successful and contributing more to the betterment of the world. They just never boast about it. But as a shopkeeping in a gold shop, he may be too naive to see it and yet he wants to boast how great his ideology is.

Let us all ask him one simple question, has he ever produce his own underwear? Well for me, I may not as well, but if Google and WordPress decided to close the blog, at least I can still write my own blog software from scratch.